| MP 2001 Speakers |
Advantages Gained by Using a Common
Classification and Nomenclature for Medical Devices
|
||||||
|
Nordans Ark, Strømsborgveien 53B, NO 0287 Oslo, Norway Tel: +47 22438301 Fax: +47 22442597 E-mail: jacn@start.no |
![]() |
|
| Biography
Educated at: Leicester
College of Art and Technology, UK Special
Adviser on Medical Devices at the Norwegian Board
of Health (NBH). NBH is the Competent Authority for Medical
Devices in Norway Experience:
National delegate to: European
Commission Medical Devices Expert Group, EFTA delegate to: Global Harmonization Task Force: Plenary,
Study Group 2 on Vigilance and National delegate to: CEN BTS3 Healthcare, Lecturer at the PRAQ III Seminars in Central and Eastern Europe (Albania, Macedonia, Bosnia, Slovenia, Slovakia, Hungary, Lithuenia, Romania) Member of the Project Council of the Global Medical Device Nomenclature
|
Abstract
GMDN
(Global Medical Device Nomenclature) is based on EN ISO 15225 Nomenclature
– Specification for a nomenclature system for medical devices
for the purpose of regulatory data exchange. Some 70 people
were involved in its development, notably from Europe, Japan and
US. Within
all medical devices regulations a number of obligations are placed
on the manufacturer. Authorities are faced with the task of
regulating manufacturers and their devices, and people are
involved in trade with these devices, e.g., suppliers, before
these devices finally are brought into use. Hence, as an
assistance tool, there is a need for a common method for
describing and identifying the device in question in an
unambiguous manner. The
GMDN’s main content is a generic definition and a term suitable
for each group of devices having a number of properties in common.
These Groups, at present some 7.000, each have their own unique
code assigned. The Generic Device Groups are placed into 12
Categories. Below the level of Generic Device Group the
manufacturer operates with his Device Type identification. In
the post marketing phase feedback from the users is an all
important key factor for any vigilance system where information is
collected and reacted upon. For trading purposes, including
tendering procedures, the generic definition given in the GMDN is
useful. With electronic trading these advantages will be obvious. All parties involved with medical devices; be it manufacturers, regulators, conformity assessment bodies, traders, owners or users will all have a common interest in an unambiguous classification, i.e. a definition and term, with each device. The obvious person to assign a device to its class is the manufacturer.
|